http://antiwar-news.disqus.com/enThu, 21 Aug 2008 08:47:59 -0000http://news.antiwar.com/2008/08/20/at-least-eight-killed-in-wana-missile-strike/#comment-1715598<p>I know... it sounds weird, but they still refer to their leadership as "Supreme Allied Commanders", and all the other media outlets refer to them as "allied forces". Until we get some confirmation of who actually launched the missiles its probably best to be as non-specific as possible. </p>jasonditzThu, 21 Aug 2008 08:47:59 -0000http://news.antiwar.com/2008/08/20/at-least-eight-killed-in-wana-missile-strike/#comment-1714044<p>"first Alliied strike in Pakistan..." is this WWII?</p>OblivionThu, 21 Aug 2008 03:25:03 -0000http://news.antiwar.com/2008/08/20/at-least-eight-killed-in-wana-missile-strike/#comment-1705914<p>These airstrike are more about destabilizing the region than about actually killing the terrorists. When the top two Alqaida leaders can do no more than issue a tape every few months, what can these lesser operatives actually do to harm us? Even if we assume that there was a militant in the dwelling there was no need to kill all those innocent 'collaterals'? Such terrorist acts will just lead to more terrorism and innocent people will pay the price.</p>masmanzWed, 20 Aug 2008 17:38:11 -0000